Episode 3
The Roswell Incident
- Where
- Roswell, New Mexico
- When
- July 1947
- Narrator
- Danvers
- Verdict
- Probably explained
- Weirdness
- 6/10
The agency, above Frank's Chippy
A blustery Friday night in late OctoberFriday night, late October. The wind was trying the windows, the chip shop was frying its last cod, and an ocean away somebody had just published the seventh batch of America's UFO files. Hargreaves had read them before we had.
(shaking rain off his coat and slapping a printout down on the desk) Roswell. The Americans have put out their seventh batch of UFO files tonight, and in it there's a sworn affidavit from the 1947 base's own press officer: an egg-shaped craft in a guarded hangar, two bodies under a tarpaulin. It's been in books since 2007, so don't go thinking you've discovered fire. I'm flying you both to New Mexico, so it's economy, it's one bag, and I'm not paying for crisps at thirty thousand feet, Foxley.
(tucking a family bag of crisps into his corduroy jacket) Discovered fire? No, Hargreaves, but look who's holding the match: the same press officer who sent out the "flying disc" release on 8 July 1947 signed this affidavit in 2002, so he's at both ends of the story. The Air Force has changed its explanation twice since then, and I'd like to know why the one man who was in the room ends where he started.
(unscrewing her flask) He was consistent, I'll give you that. But the rancher's uncle used the words "flying disk" in Corona on 5 July, three days before they turned up in the base's press release, so the phrase may have come from the neighbours before the military ever used it. And between his two signatures our man co-founded a UFO museum in Roswell, which tells me he believed his story for 55 years, not that it was true.
(snapping his notebook shut) Fair hit about the uncle, Danvers: maybe the phrase came from the neighbours first. But it was a US Army Air Field that put those words out to the Associated Press, and if our man spent his retirement building a museum to his story, then 114 North Main Street, Roswell, is our first stop, research library and all.
The International UFO Museum, Roswell
Monday morning, bright sunMonday. Roswell, New Mexico. One long flight, one bag each, and a city that has put alien heads on its street lamps. The museum on North Main Street used to be a cinema. In a way, it still is.
(squeezing his lanky frame into the spaceship cockpit exhibit, wellies jammed against the controls) Bit snug for an egg-shaped craft twelve to fifteen feet long, Danvers, but our man said no windows, so at least I'm not missing the view. And before you point at the alien autopsy display, yes, I know that film was staged in a London living room. That's why I'm heading for the research library next, and not the waxworks.
(unfolding a printout from the US Air Force's 1995 report and smoothing it flat against the cockpit glass) The library's a sensible choice, Foxley, and I mean that. But before you go, here's a Project Mogul balloon train: radar reflectors made of foil, paper and balsa-like sticks, and Brazel described what he found as "tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks", almost the same list. Flight 4 launched on 4 June and was lost within 17 miles of his ranch, so let's start with the boring explanation, which has the advantage of matching what the man actually picked up.
(tapping the diagram, then flipping his notebook open) I'll give you the shopping list, Danvers: foil, paper and sticks is a very close match. But look at the dates on the government's own Roswell files: they run from 4 June, the day Flight 4 launched, to 10 July, the day Alamogordo put on its balloon show for the press. That's my own theory, not proof, but it looks to me like somebody decided the answer was a balloon and then drew the file's edges around it, so I want to know what's sitting just outside those dates.
(folding the diagram away and checking her watch) I'll grant you the bookends match, Foxley, and I hadn't spotted that myself. The boring reading is that any file on this would naturally start when the likely culprit launched and stop when the press lost interest, but you're right that a file built around one answer could leave the awkward bits out, and the affidavit itself only turns up decades later. So let's look outside the dates: the old air field is about five miles south of town, and that's where Building 84, his guarded hangar, would have been.
The old Roswell Army Air Field
Monday afternoon, hot windFive miles south, the old air field. The wind came off the desert like a hairdryer, and beyond the fence row upon row of retired airliners sat in the sun, waiting for nobody.
(pressing his binoculars to the fence, wellies sinking into the dust) Look at that, Danvers: rows and rows of retired airliners, more than three hundred of them parked out here in 2020. They brought them to the desert to be forgotten, which is what I think happened to this place's 1947 story. Somewhere past that 13,000-foot runway was Building 84, and I'd love to know whether anyone's thought to check if it's still standing.
(pouring a cup of tea from her flask and squinting through the heat haze) I honestly don't know whether Building 84 is still standing, Foxley, and I won't pretend to; all I know is that this place became Walker Air Force Base and closed in 1967. Here's something I hadn't noticed until now, though: the story came back in 1978, eleven years after the base shut, when there was no longer a base here to argue with anyone. Let's drive out to the ranch country near Corona at sunset, where the debris actually fell, because that's the one place in this story that wasn't built by somebody.
Ranch country near Corona
Monday, sunsetSunset, out near Corona. No museum, no gift shop, no alien street lamps. Just scrub, wind, and a sky the colour of a warning.
(turning slowly in the scrub, the wind tugging at his curls) Eleven years is a good catch, Danvers, I'll give you that: once the base had gone there was nobody left to contradict anyone, but I'd ask whether there was also nobody left to keep people quiet. Out here it was several acres of foil, tape and sticks, and Brazel's daughter remembered flower patterns on the tape, which doesn't sound much like a flying saucer, I'll admit. So here's my headline for Hargreaves: "ROSWELL: THE ARMY SAID DISC, THE AIR FORCE SAID BALLOON, THEN IT SAID DUMMIES, AND THOSE WERE YEARS TOO LATE."
The Sunday Lantern
The following FridayFriday, back in England. Hargreaves read our copy with his glasses pushed up on his forehead, which is never a good sign. Until it was.
(leaping up from the desk, red pen pointing at the page) Foxley, the government's own Roswell file starts on 4 June, the day Flight 4 went up, and ends on 10 July, the day Alamogordo showed the press its balloons, and Danvers, the story only came back eleven years after the base shut; I've never seen either of those in print, so get me the front page held! (Grabbing the phone, then stopping, receiver in mid-air.) The dates go in as fact, but "someone drew the edges around the answer" is a guess, and I won't print a guess as fact. (Sitting back down heavily and circling a line on the airline receipts.) And what's this, Foxley, crisps at thirty thousand feet, after I told you in so many words?
(sliding the receipt back across the desk with a sheepish grin) Fair enough, Hargreaves, print the dates as fact and put my bit in as a question with my name under it: why does the government's file start and stop exactly where the balloon story does? As for the crisps, they were an investigative expense, because a man can't think about a craft with no windows, wings or landing gear on an empty stomach.
(setting her flask down on the invoice) Print my eleven years as a date, Hargreaves, not a conclusion: the debris was still foil, paper, tape and sticks. But I can't explain why the base's own spokesman swore to a craft and two bodies 55 years later, so I'll give it six out of ten for weirdness, and Foxley's crisps a two.
(capping the red pen and initialling the copy) Probably explained: the debris is a Mogul balloon train, foil, paper, tape and sticks, and the Lantern runs it that way, with Foxley's file dates on the front as fact and his "why there?" printed as a question with his name under it. Danvers gets a point for the balloon diagram and the eleven-year gap. Foxley gets one for spotting the file's bookends and the dummies turning up years too late, and the press officer's affidavit stays unexplained. (Sighing, ticking a line on the invoice.) The crisps go through this once, because of the scoop, and if I see them on next week's expenses they come out of your fee.
The Lantern ran the dates as fact, and Foxley's question with his name under it. The crisps went through. The affidavit is still unexplained. And somewhere outside 4 June and 10 July 1947, there may be something nobody has filed yet.
ROSWELL FILES BEGIN AND END WITH THE BALLOON
The US government's Roswell material covers reports dated 4 June to 10 July 1947, the day Mogul Flight 4 launched to the day Alamogordo showed the press its balloons. Foxley asks: why there?
By Foxley & Danvers, our investigators
- Roswell incident (Wikipedia)
- UFO files release (2026) (Wikipedia)
- The US government's UFO files (war.gov)
- Roswell witness affidavit in the seventh release (NTD)
- File DOW-UAP-D168 and the affidavit (IBTimes)
- International UFO Museum and Research Center (Wikipedia)
- Roswell International Air Center (Wikipedia)